Primarily for general aviation discussion, but other aviation topics are also welcome.
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
User avatar
By GrahamB
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#2027249
Shoestring Flyer wrote:When visiting Welshpool I often wonder what the late Bob Jones, airfield owner, had on the altimeter subscale that fatefully day when he hit the hillside?

Fixed that for you.
User avatar
By GrahamB
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#2027251
Shoestring Flyer wrote:When visiting Welshpool I often wonder what the late Bob Poole, airfield owner, had on the altimeter subscale that fatefully day when he hit the hillside?

It's pure speculation, but given his qualifications and type of flying he did, along with those of the guy* he was checking out in the Navajo, it's highly unlikely to have been QFE.

* who did the first two days of my full-time IMC course back in '93, and who drummed flying on QNH into me from the first hour.
#2027255
GrahamB wrote:
Shoestring Flyer wrote:When visiting Welshpool I often wonder what the late Bob Poole, airfield owner, had on the altimeter subscale that fatefully day when he hit the hillside?

It's pure speculation, but given his qualifications and type of flying he did, along with those of the guy* he was checking out in the Navajo, it's highly unlikely to have been QFE.

* who did the first two days of my full-time IMC course back in '93, and who drummed flying on QNH into me from the first hour.


Interesting thoughts....Thanks.
#2027263
GrahamB wrote:
Shoestring Flyer wrote:When visiting Welshpool I often wonder what the late Bob Jones, airfield owner, had on the altimeter subscale that fateful day when he hit the hillside?

Fixed that for you.


There, fixed it for both of you. :thumright:
User avatar
By GrahamB
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#2027267
JAFO wrote:
GrahamB wrote:
Shoestring Flyer wrote:When visiting Welshpool I often wonder what the late Bob Jones, airfield owner, had on the altimeter subscale that fateful day when he hit the hillside?

Fixed that for you.


There, fixed it for both of you. :thumright:


There's nitpicking and there's nitpicking :D
JAFO liked this
#2028223
FredFly wrote:With all the machinations that we have to go through to land at a UK airfield (PPR, local procedures, circuit info, noise abatement areas, ect), who shows up without knowing the airfield altitude?

I agree with the replies above that QFE is moronic.


Exactly. How hard to add 1000 to the airfield elevation rounded up/down. And don't be obsessing with something like 324ft, that's just 300 plus 1000. If it's 176 then make it 200. From mid-late downwind nobody should then be looking at the altimeter anyway.

I suppose we have 99% also who blindly reach for the knob when told the QNH has changed and is now X. It's 27ft difference!!! I don't even bother.
JodelDavo liked this
By johnm
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#2028229
js1643 wrote:I suppose we have 99% also who blindly reach for the knob when told the QNH has changed and is now X. It's 27ft difference!!! I don't even bother.



Oh I bother, when landing off a precision approach with decision height of 250 ft, 27 ft is noticeable....
#2028242
FredFly wrote:
I agree with the replies above that QFE is moronic.


That puts me in the same camp as Gordon then. 42 years of flying like a moron. It's a wonder I've survived. Must remember to check that my altimeter isn't reading zero before I take off for some circuit work. :)
Kittyhawk, Rob P V2.0, Boxkite and 4 others liked this
By Rjk983
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#2028391
Come on @defcribed , keep up please.

We’ve had at least 20% of the thread devoted to it so the topic title needs another update please…

Basic Service, RT competency, See & Avoid and Altimeter Settings

You could maybe also add a side note for knee board chat?

And I’m disappointed that nobody has tried to convince us of the merits of which way to hold the chart while looking out the window, speaking to the controller and changing the altimeter.

So Track up, QFE in the circuit, written down on my knee board, traffic or deconfliction service and I’m a happy boy…
mick w liked this
#2028426
I fully understand the limitations of a BASIC Service. I still find it odd that when under a Radar SERVICE the only service you get, can be advising you after infringing!
Happened recently to a Group aircraft, with Mode S and ADS B, when after 15 mins under a Farnborough allocated transponder code.
( Minor infringement after a miss reading of a Airspace limit )
#2028500
Oldfart wrote:In future when near controlled airspace our Group will request a Traffic Service.
On the day in question though, Farnborough East and North were unmanned, and no Traffic Service was available due “Controller Workload.”!!

Care to expand upon what you consider a “minor infringement after misreading an airspace limit”? Withholding comment without more detail.
JustABasicService liked this
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19