I can’t see the point in having a speed limiting filter/setting at all. Is this just another setting to fiddle with?
If the target turns out to be unmoving, in a house, Shirley it’s not much of a threat?
Crash one wrote:I can’t see the point in having a speed limiting filter/setting at all. Is this just another setting to fiddle with?
If the target turns out to be unmoving, in a house, Shirley it’s not much of a threat?
Crash one wrote:I can’t see the point in having a speed limiting filter/setting at all. Is this just another setting to fiddle with?
If the target turns out to be unmoving, in a house, Shirley it’s not much of a threat?
malcolmfrost wrote:Crash one wrote:I can’t see the point in having a speed limiting filter/setting at all. Is this just another setting to fiddle with?
If the target turns out to be unmoving, in a house, Shirley it’s not much of a threat?
The problem is that if you get too many false warnings (or rather warnings that aren't meaningful) one tends to start ignoring them.
The accident was investigated by the Spanish Accident Investigation Board, who determined the most likely cause to have been pilot error, and a failure to follow proper instrument approach procedures. The pilot was not precisely aware of his position, and the Board determined he had "set out to intercept the ILS on an incorrect track", which placed the aircraft over the wrong terrain for his approach, in a hilly region of rapidly changing terrain height. [3]
The crew also did not respond properly to the ground-proximity warning system (GPWS), which can be heard on the flight recording. (There is a persistent rumor that the pilot responded to the GPWS by saying "Shut up, Gringo" but this is not borne out by the transcript of the recording; the pilot responds to 15 seconds of GPWS warning with "Bueno, beuno", roughly, "Ok, ok" in English.[4][5])
PaulSS wrote:@Crash one Re-read Boeing Boy's original post. If an experienced pilot such as he can be distracted then an issue exists.
There's no 'fiddling' involved with setting up an 'air switch'; it's just a simple matter of telling the machine what you consider to be your aircraft's parameters for being airbourne. You set it, save it and then forget about it. What that prevents is people like Boeing Boy having the s**t scared out of him just as he takes to the air and THEN having to diagnose the problem.
Your simplistic view of the solution is not at all helpful and fails to take into account any of the human factors involved in a situation that distracts and requires immediate diagnosis due to the urgency level of the warning. A patronising reply of 'look out the window' does nothing to solve the very real problem.
What it does need is for people to read their instruction books, understand their equipment and set the air switches. For those using extended squitters in Mode S transponders that don't have an air switch, turn the poxy things to standby once off the runway.
Rather than set a speed of your own aircraft........all that setting a speed does is to tell your ADSB when to start transmitting. We want people to do that, instead of it blaring all the time and causing unnecessary warnings
why not program the device to warn if the distance is decreasing but not warn otherwise............clearly that set up would have resulted in the same situation in Boeing Boy's case but, in the wider context, restricting the kit to such narrow parameters reduces the ability to build up a bigger picture of what's going on around you. For instance, yesterday I saw (on my SkyDemon, provided for by my PilotAware) an RV in a big left turn off to my front right hand side. I was able to consider the fact that his big turn was going to result in him coming at me in about 250 degrees more turning and, so, manoeuvred to my left a bit to increase the separation. With your suggestion I would have received a warning about him much later and MAY have had to take some fairly evasive manoeuvre. In the event, thanks to the bigger air picture, I was able to avoid any of that nonsense and keep Mrs SS far less jittery than she would have been with a red warning and a largish turn.
........and set the warning distance to less than a mile or what you feel safe with?......you can already do that.
Or better, set the collision time in seconds!..........How would that have worked in the example above? The RV was only inbound to me during the last 20 degrees or so of his turn, so it would have been a very late warning. I could have set it to warn me of traffic within 2 minutes but that wouldn't have made any difference in this case to the lateness of the warning I would have received. TCAS uses closest point of approach but, I suggest, this is much more useful in the CAT world where most of the time you're flying in a straight line and any turns etc are quite leisurely.
I can’t see the value in speed settings.