Primarily for general aviation discussion, but other aviation topics are also welcome.
  • 1
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 30
User avatar
By Talkdownman
#1754742
flybymike wrote:I’m impressed to learn that you and TDM ever agreed on anything. :wink:

Rest easy, FBM, it's not true. It can only be a figment of Mr. chevvron's imagination. Unlike he, I was never a Watch Manager. I managed to avoid becoming such a self-exalted , élitist, macho-posturing prima-donna.
By Liquor15_7924
#1754745
" I was never a Watch Manager. I managed to avoid becoming such a self-exalted , élitist, macho-posturing prima-donna."

Ha ha, brilliant. Same here and not the slightest regret. The place is full of pompous clowns now.

Tempted to quote something from Not Airway but I would get banned from here.
By chevvron
#1754760
Talkdownman wrote:
flybymike wrote:I’m impressed to learn that you and TDM ever agreed on anything. :wink:

Rest easy, FBM, it's not true. It can only be a figment of Mr. chevvron's imagination. Unlike he, I was never a Watch Manager. I managed to avoid becoming such a self-exalted , élitist, macho-posturing prima-donna.

Ah but after a 'clash' with my prima donna ex Heathrow boss (who as far as I know never gained a C of C on APS whilst working for NATS) where she tried to get me sacked, I was 'downgraded' and ended my days as an ordinary working controller so I was much happier.
I only applied for the Watch Manager post in order to avoid a compulsory posting anyway. :pray:
User avatar
By Paul_Sengupta
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1755399
Yes, I think so, though I'm not in the local area at the moment. Locals are reporting that it's pretty busy. Looking at FR24 there are loads of private jets flying around.
By Skylaunch2
#1755436
Farnborough continues to operate but with minimum staffing required. Most Farnborough/Wessex group airfields are now closed or restricted so nearly all sectors are bandboxed. Rumours that Farnborough may have reduced operating hours soon.
By chevvron
#1755725
Human Factor wrote:New Manchester LLR Procedures

Any reason why there can’t be a Farnborough LLR with the same assumed SVFR?

Apart from the fact D133 might get in the way on the rare occasions it's notified above 1300ft, they could use the 'corridor' I mentioned above at #1754676.
User avatar
By Human Factor
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1755818
They certainly could. My question is more along the lines of why was a Manchester style low-level route including implied SVFR not implemented when the airspace was changed?
By chevvron
#1755883
Human Factor wrote:They certainly could. My question is more along the lines of why was a Manchester style low-level route including implied SVFR not implemented when the airspace was changed?

Dunno mate; both myself and other Farnborough controllers suggested it on several occasions pre Nov 2008. :cry: and it would 'work' for either Fairoaks traffic or transits like it did during the airshow.
Simple to plot too; stay south of the OCK radial which goes through WOD and north of Bagshot Mast not above (say) 1500ft; watch out for H3 joiners/leavers and Bob was my uncle (died a few years ago).
kanga liked this
User avatar
By flybymike
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1755889
Where would you propose for the LLR?
There’s a fair bit more room between the Manchester and Liverpool runways that there is between Fairoaks and Farnborough.

Edit. Chevvers just posted above....
  • 1
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 30