Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:02 pm
#1729599
patowalker wrote:Yes and yes.
Thank you, but I need chapter and verse to underpin that - if you could.
patowalker wrote:Yes and yes.
patowalker wrote:Yes and yes.
Dave W wrote:Thank you, but I need chapter and verse to underpin that - if you could.
nickwilcock wrote:AMC/GM associated with the Aircrew Regulation amendment are anticipated to be included in the next revision of 'Easy Access Rules for Aircrew'.
User72 wrote:With regard to the 'Final Action', what happens if form is not sent to CAA? Pilot's licence is signed and therefore is valid for another 2 years. Is this just a data collection step?
David Wood wrote:Very useful one-pager, Irv. Thank you.
If I make one small politely suggested amendment it would be to the line in the Transponder section that suggests that someone wearing a listening squawk should not expect to be contacted by ATC unless they infringe.
I dion't think that that's correct.
I myself have been called quite a few times when wearing listening squawks, and it's always been for matters other any potential or actual infringement.
....
It's mostly been about other traffic...
For ratings, the rating date is extended 2 years if prof check is in final 3 months of rating validity,
Revalidation of class and type ratings must normally take place within 3 months of expiry for the new validity period to start from the current expiry date.