Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:18 am
#1729502
Critique requested. @Irv Lee, maybe? Or @Cookie, if he still visits?
Is this updated draft correct and unambiguous?
(The only changes from the previous Issue 1.5 are within the thick red box, which will appear in the draft version only)
Does the "Zero" in the 'P1/PIC Minimum' column require an explanatory Note, do you think?
--
I have not included anything about now perhaps being able to count microlight hours towards an EASA SEP/TMG Reval by Exp, as suggested in @ak7274's post here, as I am not certain that is correct.
If it is correct, does it apply to both PPL(A) and LAPL(A)? (Note 4 and penultimate column apply)
I'd be grateful if somebody is able to advise either way - referencing chapter & verse.
--
Finally, is 'Note 1' now obsolete?
Is this updated draft correct and unambiguous?
(The only changes from the previous Issue 1.5 are within the thick red box, which will appear in the draft version only)
Does the "Zero" in the 'P1/PIC Minimum' column require an explanatory Note, do you think?
--
I have not included anything about now perhaps being able to count microlight hours towards an EASA SEP/TMG Reval by Exp, as suggested in @ak7274's post here, as I am not certain that is correct.
If it is correct, does it apply to both PPL(A) and LAPL(A)? (Note 4 and penultimate column apply)
I'd be grateful if somebody is able to advise either way - referencing chapter & verse.
--
Finally, is 'Note 1' now obsolete?