Primarily for general aviation discussion, but other aviation topics are also welcome.
User avatar
By foxmoth
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1698622
Reach for the Skies on TV now and Bader joins his new squadron and to show them he is not a “passenger” gets airborne in a Hurricane to show them he can fly - during this he does an inverted pass - I would have thought this would have been with a normal carburettor so why didn’t the engine cut out?
User avatar
By lobstaboy
#1698631
foxmoth wrote:Reach for the Skies on TV now and Bader joins his new squadron and to show them he is not a “passenger” gets airborne in a Hurricane to show them he can fly - during this he does an inverted pass - I would have thought this would have been with a normal carburettor so why didn’t the engine cut out?


It's a great film, but you do know it's not a documentary, right?
User avatar
By foxmoth
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1698632
Yes I know that and that the film was obviously made at a later date, but were later Hurricanes fuel injected or fitted with an inverted carb?
Last edited by foxmoth on Fri Jun 07, 2019 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By Highland Park
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1698637
foxmoth wrote:Yes I know that and that the film was obviously made at a later date, but were later Hurricanes fuel injected or fitted with an inverted carb?

The Merlin was never fuel injected IIRC, a weakness when compared with the Daimler Benz in the Bf109...

Also I’m reasonably sure the scene in the film wasn’t real and was a model (and indeed I have no idea if it actually happened in real life...).

Ian
User avatar
By joe-fbs
#1698645
Just pulled my copy of Reach for the Sky (a 1954 hardback, blimey I think it's a frst edition, complete with newspaper cuttings from when Sir Douglas died in 1982) from my bookshelf. Chapter 14 starts with the scene created in the film. Was Paul Brickhill a historian or a novelist? Obviously the jump from book to film can be large. As far as I can tell, the films of Dambusters and Reach for the Sky are as accurate as filmaking ever is but the film of The Great Escape is fiction (they even change Roger Bushell to Roger Bartlet).
Last edited by joe-fbs on Fri Jun 07, 2019 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By lobstaboy
#1698646
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Shilling%27s_orifice

Despite the apparently risque title this link is to the wiki page that gives a bit of background.
Essentially at the time the scene in the film was set, inverted flight was going to be a problem because of the normal carbs fitted to Merlin engines. An issue in the first years of the war, as it explains. Miss Shillings Orifice was a temporary solution for short duration manoeuvres involving negative G - introduced in 1941. Carbs that completely overcame the problem introduced in 1943 for Merlins.

Added - Joefbs beat me to it...
User avatar
By Dave W
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1698648
IIRC Paul Brickhill was a pilot and POW originally, and became what I suppose these days we'd call a "popular historian", chronicling events he'd been involved in originally and then branching out to adjacent areas.

Edit: Yes, pretty much it. I hadn't realised until reading that (Wikipedia) that Brickhill wrote The Great Escape and The Dam Busters simultaneously!
User avatar
By foxmoth
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1698650
Added - Joefbs beat me to it...

But as you pointed out this was not for sustained inverted.
User avatar
By BEX
#1698675
I wondered about that too. (It's p*ssing down here in Hampshire, and watching seemed the best way to spend the afternoon .... my excuse)

Anyway, in the film as the aircraft was rolled the right way up the engine seemed to give out a short plume of smoke... exactly as it would after starvation and the fuel supply (and power) was restored.

Was it a series of short upside down sequences edited together?

BEX
User avatar
By joe-fbs
#1698683
Sir Stanley Hooker also comments on the orifice at the end of chapter 2 of Not Much of an Engineer including "...the hole passed sufficient fuel to keep the engine running". As had been noted above, the orifice was an interim fix while SU redesigned the carburettor. Sir Stanley also notes that injection removed the cooling effect of evaporation in the carburettor hence costing the Daimler engine some power.