Tue May 21, 2019 1:59 am
#1694965
Obvious question - why not?
Yes, I know that at present a CRI cannot teach for the NQ / NR. But why not, philosophically?
If they meet the same requirements as an FI to be able to teach for the NQ, why shouldn't they? I can see no level on which this is a more "ab-initio" task than, say, tailwheel or complex. So is there any valid rationale for not permitting this?
G
Yes, I know that at present a CRI cannot teach for the NQ / NR. But why not, philosophically?
If they meet the same requirements as an FI to be able to teach for the NQ, why shouldn't they? I can see no level on which this is a more "ab-initio" task than, say, tailwheel or complex. So is there any valid rationale for not permitting this?
G
I am Spartacus, and so is my co-pilot.