johnm wrote:I am very surprised it passed the stringent tests it must have faced to be used in critical national infrastructure.
If only such diligence was in use.....
Or rather, if only warnings made by those performing such due diligence and reporting of shortcomings were heeded by Ministers for whom the lowest vaguely plausible tender which appeared to meet the requirements must be accepted, even apparently in CNI if 5G is deemed such. When Huawei was first bidding for digital exchanges work, the warnings
were heeded, but the privatised BT could not be directed by Government to reject the bid, so the taxpayer had to spend a lot of money protecting CNI from the detected or (more worrying, merely suspected) security and reliability flaws. Outside CNI, of course, government has little or no power to direct a private company not to accept a low bid.
Still, Huawei has promised to sign 'no spy' agreements, so that's reassuring ..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48276822
(mere guide at) Jet Age Museum, Gloucestershire Airport
http://www.jetagemuseum.org/TripAdvisor Excellence Award 2015
http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Attraction ... gland.html