Sat Jan 28, 2017 2:23 am
#1515369
I am interested to know how owners of private use aeroplanes are going forward with maintenance after LAMP which is now finished.
Simply put. I think there are three options: a bespoke maintenance plan: use of the new MIP and continuing with CAMO using some other formal plan of maintenance.
I reckon few will go for the first option; most going for the second.
I was intending to keep with my CAMO, but since he is in France regulated by the DGAC, I fall foul of a curved ball from the CAA which says that my machine will therefore come under DGAC inspection regulstions: said regulations being triple gold plated when compared with CAA.
Thus, the part M lite, for me could work out to be a part M ultra heavy.
My preference is to use a version of MIP but it is proving hard to get my favourite maintainer to go along with this for reasons best known to himself.
To get some idea as to what is going on out there. It would be helpful to know the route others are taking.
Thanks.
RT.
Simply put. I think there are three options: a bespoke maintenance plan: use of the new MIP and continuing with CAMO using some other formal plan of maintenance.
I reckon few will go for the first option; most going for the second.
I was intending to keep with my CAMO, but since he is in France regulated by the DGAC, I fall foul of a curved ball from the CAA which says that my machine will therefore come under DGAC inspection regulstions: said regulations being triple gold plated when compared with CAA.
Thus, the part M lite, for me could work out to be a part M ultra heavy.
My preference is to use a version of MIP but it is proving hard to get my favourite maintainer to go along with this for reasons best known to himself.
To get some idea as to what is going on out there. It would be helpful to know the route others are taking.
Thanks.
RT.