Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:47 pm
#1488314
Good afternoon all,
Thank you very much for the replies and extra information - I am the former student in question.
As to current position and experience - I have a total of 76:57 hours (including 28 solo/PIC) logged, although it's now my understanding that 9:25 of them cannot count as they were obtained before age 14. My FAA PPL currency is good until 5th April 2017 and medical is good until April 2018. I also completed all 9 EASA PPL ground examinations earlier this year, the last one being in May. At present I'm at NATS on their ab-initio ATCO training programme, destined to be an area controller but whether at Swanwick or Prestwick not known for another few months. As a result, I do not anticipate being able to fly for more than an hour every 4-6 weeks at best.
Of late, I've been working with the intention of gaining my EASA PPL 'from scratch' as it were, as it's my understanding that hours obtained thus far can be credited. However, in addition to the skill test, it seems that I would need to 'complete an approved course of training' to the regulatory satisfaction of the flight school in question, with no real idea how many hours that might entail.
Based on my understanding of the above, to obtain an NPPL (SSEA) and assuming a favourable consideration of my existing experience, I would simply have to complete the NST and GST. As it also seems to me that since I (would then) meet all the conditions for the NPPL>LAPL conversion as detailed in CAP 804, a LAPL could then be issued with no extra work.
Looking at Part-FCL 210 & 235, which CAP 804 indicates are necessary to comply with in order to convert to a full PPL, it still seems that a course of training must be completed, in addition to the PPL Skill Test.
Assuming my understanding is correct at all points, would the NPPL>LAPL>PPL route actually not save me time/flying/administration over the 'new' PPL route?
Apologies for the big wall of text, I hope it's all reasonably clear!