kanga wrote:in recognition of his philanthropic activitiesSooty25 wrote:Colston wasn't considered a bad person in his era. His business was legal, generated revenue, employment and no doubt paid taxes. Bristol benefited very nicely from him. ...
.. but the statue was commissioned and erected many decades later by a 'business owners club'*,
by which time Colston's activity had long been illegal and deplored, apparently in an attempt to enhance the reputation of those later businessfolk. The analogy would be the BBC commissioning Gill to create a statue and then erecting it at Broadcasting House after the details of his private diaries and proclivities were publicly known; that's not what happened.
* still active, with professed wholly philanthropic purpose; which is not to deny that they do good things today:
https://www.merchantventurers.com/
Pete L wrote:I do like "angryist".
Paultheparaglider wrote:Tempora mutantur et nos mutamur in illis. A good expression which means times are changed; we also are changed with them.
Judging the past by the present is ultimately futile. It focuses on the wrong issue. What is far more important is to understand why times have changed, and how you want to further change things going forward.
Chucking the statue in the harbour probably slows progress more than it advances it because it is self indulgent, childish behaviour. It is uncivilised behaviour.
They could have found better ways to make their protest, but all would have involved a lot more hard work and have resulted in less instant gratification.
A bunch of silly kids who will hopefully grow up to be more constructive members of society. The jury is still out on that one.
Sooty25 wrote:He even acted as their MP, so presumably the majority liked him then.
Sooty25 wrote:... He even acted as their MP, so presumably the majority liked him then. ..
Bill McCarthy wrote:Slavery didn’t die out 180 years ago - in the far north, it had another name up to the late 50s (when mechanisation advanced rapidly) and that was farm servant, the now farm worker. I escaped to sea.
nallen wrote:Sooty25 wrote:He even acted as their MP, so presumably the majority liked him then.
You don't know much about parliamentary elections in the 17th/18th centuries, do you?
(After Colston's time but not much had changed …)
Paultheparaglider wrote:Not again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-59996870