Cessna57 wrote:So the lady he hit is without a car, while he has his nice new Range Rover 2 days later.
Your point is? Is that not the likely scenario in many an accident?
Of course she has the payment for her story from the Sunday press to compensate.
Cessna57 wrote:...they didn’t even say sorry...
So you've chosen to believe the stories that say he hasn't rather than those that claim he phoned them?
TBH I wouldn't be surprised if he was advised not to have personal contact, especially if there was reasonable suspicion she would be going to the press.
Cessna57 wrote:...and then I had to fight for insurance...
How do you know she has to fight with her insurance? Was she not insured properly?
Or are you just using inflammatory language for effect?
Cessna57 wrote:They could at least hire her a car.
Why, would you hire someone a car?
Do you know her insurance does not cover a hire car? Maybe the Palace has offered to help, however given there seems to be a police investigation I'd suggest caution one's actions couldn't be seen as admitting guilt may be advisable?
Cessna57 wrote:As I say, my estimation of the Royal Family has just gone downwards.
From your post I get the impression it wasn't very high previously.
In fact seems to me you are differentiating in your expectations entirely due to his position.
Misc.