For help, advice and discussion about stuff not related to aviation. Play nice: no religion, no politics and no axe grinding please.
By malcolmfrost
#1513756
Something Mrs. May needs to learn is that America NEVER does anything that isn't overwhelmingly in their interest. Just try and get a computer hacker extradited to the UK.....
User avatar
By Genghis the Engineer
#1513758
johnm wrote:I have always acknowledged that the EU is imperfect, indeed very imperfect! However I also believe strongly that collaboration and co-operation is the way of the future if we want a peaceful,and prosperous world.

Nation states are already obsolete in some areas,


Yet you support the EU, which is very overtly trying to create a centralised very large national state built upon only semi-democratic central rule.

I also believe in collaboration and co-operation, it's why I voted to leave the shooting match! Because I don't believe in centralised governance that the population has little control over.

G
User avatar
By matthew_w100
#1513762
johnm wrote:GDP growth is a very poor measure of economic health since it can be fuelled by all sorts of undesirable economic stuff.

A big GDP growth accompanied by massive balance of payments deficit and massive government debt doesn't describe a healthy economy.


Absolutely fair point. But instead of doing the same as everyone else and just pointing out the flaws, propose something better! There MUST be a measure which can determine whether exiters or remainers were economically correct.

And PW's political dimension point is fair too. Its just that both Brussels and London are so far away from the influence of the ordinary person that I don't think it matters which is marginally closer. And actually I think it's debatable which it is.

I'm a Kentish Man in Europe.
By johnm
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1513781
If you need to understand better look to Germany, who value all aspects of industry and services and look to long term investment rather than relying on a bunch of financial shysters :twisted:
GolfHotel liked this
By johnm
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1513784
Genghis the Engineer wrote:
johnm wrote:I have always acknowledged that the EU is imperfect, indeed very imperfect! However I also believe strongly that collaboration and co-operation is the way of the future if we want a peaceful,and prosperous world.

Nation states are already obsolete in some areas,


Yet you support the EU, which is very overtly trying to create a centralised very large national state built upon only semi-democratic central rule.

I also believe in collaboration and co-operation, it's why I voted to leave the shooting match! Because I don't believe in centralised governance that the population has little control over.

G


The EU is a French bureaucracy at this point. It may always be so and the French seem to get on OK. 27 out of 28 countries also manage to work with it. So " Everybody is out of step except our Jimmy" :roll:
User avatar
By Genghis the Engineer
#1513801
The EU is a French bureaucracy at this point. It may always be so and the French seem to get on OK. 27 out of 28 countries also manage to work with it. So " Everybody is out of step except our Jimmy" :roll:


You might want to look at the satisfaction levels with the EU around Europe. This is last June I believe. No, I don't know why there are two Germanies either - I've linked to the article it's from below.

Image
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/678 ... -continent

It does seem to imply that there would have been a much stronger vote for Frexit than Brexit, had that country been given a choice.

G
User avatar
By SteveN
#1513805
One thing is for sure. If that Guy Verhofstadt character is heading up the EU negotiations they are not going to be protracted.
User avatar
By nallen
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1513810
Genghis the Engineer wrote:No, I don't know why there are two Germanies either


And yet you quote it...!

You could have at least tried ascertaining the source of the graph: the "Spring Global Attitudes Suvey [sic]: Q10c" -- then you would have found the second "Germany" is in fact Greece: original source here: http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/06/07/euroskepticism-beyond-brexit/.

And then you might decide never again to quote the Express as a reliable source of anything. :)

Genghis the Engineer wrote:It does seem to imply that there would have been a much stronger vote for Frexit than Brexit, had that country been given a choice.


You are equating from that graph, without any justification from the data, "unfavorable" views of the EU with a vote for leaving; not the same thing at all. (In August, a poll published by Le Figaro said 33% would opt for Frexit.)

(Incidentally the original Pew data includes the, frankly astonishing, statistic that "13% of those who identify with UKIP hold a favorable opinion of the EU"; make of that what you will.)
By Paultheparaglider
#1513815
nallen wrote:
Genghis the Engineer wrote:No, I don't know why there are two Germanies either


And yet you quote it...!



To be fair, there is a mighty big clue in the first line of the article. The bottom Germany is Greece, which might have been a typo, or it might have been an astute observation that Germany now runs Greece anyway. :wink:
Last edited by Paultheparaglider on Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
By johnm
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1513818
Genghis quoting the Express :shock:

As I've pointed out numerous times. I'm one of many not very satisfied with the EU, but that's very different from choosing to leave it. To leave it implies we don't think the long term vision is right or ever doable and that there's evidence that being outside would be better.
User avatar
By matthew_w100
#1513820
johnm wrote:If you need to understand better look to Germany, who value all aspects of industry and services and look to long term investment rather than relying on a bunch of financial shysters :twisted:


Agreed. How do you measure that?
By johnm
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1513823
matthew_w100 wrote:
johnm wrote:If you need to understand better look to Germany, who value all aspects of industry and services and look to long term investment rather than relying on a bunch of financial shysters :twisted:


Agreed. How do you measure that?



It's the big question isn't it? Because the answer is part cultural and part economic so parameters are things like:

    Corporate ownership national vs international and the relevant ratios
    Long term investment plans in manufacturing and infrastructure
    Respect for skills both professional and trade, e.g. Eng is used like Mr and Dr in some parts of Europe who don't call a plumber a "heating engineer", but still respect his skills.
    Focus on generating both balance of payments and government surpluses through wisely targeted investment (making stuff people want to buy at keen prices) and efficient and effective public services supported by fair and targeted taxation. Services have their place in all this of course, because factories are staffed by robots and people need work.
You get the general idea I hope, but it's undeniably very complicated.

However my big worry about what I hear from La May about Free Trade is that we have no basis for it and she doesn't even know what it means. Most of our major industries are controlled by foreign companies and/or governments as is most of our infrastructure.
User avatar
By matthew_w100
#1513825
Sure - but we shouldn't let our leaders off with vague qualitative statements like those. They have little more value than a horoscope; almost any situation in ten years time can be warped to be described as a success. We really do need some SMART objectives! (other goal setting methodologies are available).
User avatar
By Genghis the Engineer
#1513827
And yet I quote it!

For three reasons.

(1) It was reasonably easy to find.

(2) The express doesn't show quite the level of aggressive political bias of, say, the Guardian or the Telegraph on this topic.

(3) The numbers for the UK come out remarkably close to the outcome of the referendum.


But thanks those who pointed out that the second German was Greece, and the original source.


Anyhow, may I venture an opinion on the narrative. Fun 'though it is for those of us with relatively strong political views to snipe at each other about whether or why we're leaving the EU. The big and important question now, is how and when.

G