Tue Sep 07, 2021 12:52 pm
#1869173
Hi,
I'm around 2/3 through a LAPL and all going well - things going up, down and generally happily around about the place as billed.
Plan:
I want to take up my OH and children and I'm aware of the need for 10hrs post-qualification flying. This would be 'proper flying' to learn more tan just bimbling over the local nudist colonies and some hours would be shared with experienced PA28 friends on a 50:50 PIC basis. (I also wanted to change to a PPL course however it's not permitted.)
Views please on the correctness / advisability of:
1. Pass LAPL
2. 15 hrs immediate training very possibly including some of the night rating
3. PPL awarded after another test and navex
4. No need for 10 hrs post-LAPL solo
5. Total cost difference between PPL and LAPL + pax = 5 hours. And I want to do the NR anyway.
Win-win (other than should have done PPL from the get go...)?
Thank you
I'm around 2/3 through a LAPL and all going well - things going up, down and generally happily around about the place as billed.
Plan:
I want to take up my OH and children and I'm aware of the need for 10hrs post-qualification flying. This would be 'proper flying' to learn more tan just bimbling over the local nudist colonies and some hours would be shared with experienced PA28 friends on a 50:50 PIC basis. (I also wanted to change to a PPL course however it's not permitted.)
Views please on the correctness / advisability of:
1. Pass LAPL
2. 15 hrs immediate training very possibly including some of the night rating
3. PPL awarded after another test and navex
4. No need for 10 hrs post-LAPL solo
5. Total cost difference between PPL and LAPL + pax = 5 hours. And I want to do the NR anyway.
Win-win (other than should have done PPL from the get go...)?
Thank you