Artschool wrote:Allan Armadale wrote:Reference for that assertion please, I am afraid it is a myth oft quoted on this forum.
viewtopic.php?t=39018
Exactly my point, it matters not what people on an internet forum say it is the denitive law that matters. Be aware of ‘Bloke in a pub said’ references, dragons be there.
It simply is not a requirement and flying schools who force students to pass Air Law prior to first solo without a properly explore safety case are doing there customers a disservice. It is about time we myth-busted this nonsence until someone either provide the definitive reference or creates the safety case and changes the law. I can imagine a perfect day when I am flying with a student who delivers consistent ccts and is ready to solo but hasn’t had an opportunity to sit Air Law...what a shame let’s go sit in the club and get you right out of ‘the zone’ by sitting your Air Law exam
General Aviation has suffered from a number of nonsensical safety cases of the last 17 years since the implementation of JAA and perhaps before that so and we need to embrace those proven and reject those debunked.
Apologies to OP for thread drift, I’ll get off my soapbox now...
FI(A) | IRI | GR(A) | FRTOL Examiner
http://www.andrewsaviation.co.uk