Wed Jan 12, 2022 12:11 am
#1893095
I really don't like the way that all reads.
The quickest way to fall out with people is, discuss politics.
Sooty25 wrote:I really don't like the way that all reads.
Once airborne, the activation and correlation of the planned intention of flight data will typically be achieved via the association with the flight identification field transmitted from the airframe.
Sooty25 wrote:The spur of the moment Thursday evening bimble suddenly needing filed flight plans.
Rob P wrote:Sooty25 wrote:The spur of the moment Thursday evening bimble suddenly needing filed flight plans.
Hmmm.
Route: Tibenham > 50 mile radius > Tibenham
If that was part of the system I would have no difficulty SkyDemon filing a flight plan for me, in exchange for the other benefits
Rob P
Rob P wrote:Sooty25 wrote:The spur of the moment Thursday evening bimble suddenly needing filed flight plans.
Hmmm.
Route: Tibenham > 50 mile radius > Tibenham
If that was part of the system I would have no difficulty SkyDemon filing a flight plan for me, in exchange for the other benefits
Rob P
Cub wrote:FIR enhanced with surveillance
Joined up ATC services that receive and share your flight plan information (whether voluntarily submitted or provided in flight).
A defined and published EC policy giving clear direction how interoperability between users and ground services is to be achieved.
and there is no money for it in the UK.
James Chan wrote:There will be money.
StratoTramp wrote: I did pick up on the use of the word "surveillance" also. Although I am a bit primed to think of the word in a negative light especially - Rather than say just being "visible".
James Chan wrote:My guess is the primary source of funding would be from airline passengers. Most would have no objections to an additional 10-25p levy per ticket to modernise airspace, provide them with a better known traffic environment, reduce their own flight times (and emissions), and avoid delays to themselves from infringements/disjointed ATC and so on where such inefficiencies add up to many tens of pounds per ticket alone.
This levy alone could raise millions of £ per year due to the sheer volume of passengers ever year.
StratoTramp wrote:James Chan wrote:My guess is the primary source of funding would be from airline passengers. Most would have no objections to an additional 10-25p levy per ticket to modernise airspace, provide them with a better known traffic environment, reduce their own flight times (and emissions), and avoid delays to themselves from infringements/disjointed ATC and so on where such inefficiencies add up to many tens of pounds per ticket alone.
This levy alone could raise millions of £ per year due to the sheer volume of passengers ever year.
I do sometimes thing this about car fuel prices, few pence on the bill adds up when it's x 30m. Even as a low tax advocate.
Cub wrote:Rob P wrote:Sooty25 wrote:The spur of the moment Thursday evening bimble suddenly needing filed flight plans.
Hmmm.
Route: Tibenham > 50 mile radius > Tibenham
If that was part of the system I would have no difficulty SkyDemon filing a flight plan for me, in exchange for the other benefits
Rob P
I believe that is exactly the concept Rob.