Wed Oct 13, 2021 1:05 pm
#1876201
@Dave W
The SoftRF also transmits a basic FLARM signal that other FLARM users can detect (if I understand correctly). So it would be a “see and be seen” advantage as far as I can work out. Also, I have some better quality FLARM antennae that should see better classic FLARM reception ranges than I see from SkyEcho. Finally, with UAT weather/traffic starting to become an option, I could use the SkyEcho for that and the SoftRF for FLARM. I hope that makes sense? However, to do all that, I really want to be able to connect both devices to one display.
The SoftRF also transmits a basic FLARM signal that other FLARM users can detect (if I understand correctly). So it would be a “see and be seen” advantage as far as I can work out. Also, I have some better quality FLARM antennae that should see better classic FLARM reception ranges than I see from SkyEcho. Finally, with UAT weather/traffic starting to become an option, I could use the SkyEcho for that and the SoftRF for FLARM. I hope that makes sense? However, to do all that, I really want to be able to connect both devices to one display.