Mon May 10, 2021 5:17 pm
#1846112
Yep. So no basis for a mandate - the point of the thread.
Dave W wrote:Yep. So no basis for a mandate - the point of the thread.
Cub wrote:Dave W wrote:Yep. So no basis for a mandate - the point of the thread.
Perhaps, unless you are contemplating BVLOS drone ops in your Class D or Class E - also the point of the thread?
Dave W wrote:Yes, but if the BVLOS drone ops are in Class D, and I can be seen via transponder and the drone can be seen via ADS-B, why would I also be driven to require ADS-B?
Marvin wrote:Or maybe those mitigating risk in GPS approaches at small airfields unable to go down the conventional radar route.
Dave W wrote:Why is this so hard?
If I already have a transponder, what would be the case to compel me to then also equip with ADS-B?
Cub wrote:Told you we would get a bollocking!
Dave W wrote:That's what the BVLOS drone person wants to enhance their business, sure.
But [stuck record]what's the case[/stuck record] to potentially compel GA pilots to help them out with that?
Cub wrote:The case, I suggest is to achieve an acceptable level of safety while endeavouring to accommodate multiple, diverse demands on a volume of airspace.
Dave W wrote:Cub wrote:The case, I suggest is to achieve an acceptable level of safety while endeavouring to accommodate multiple, diverse demands on a volume of airspace.
That is not a case, that is an opinion.
It ignores several points e.g. the presence of a functioning transponder.
What I am asking for is a compelling argument; what I am getting from you is "Because I say so".