Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:48 am
#1792852
Many thanks, Neil, for drawing people's attention to this (and continuing to do so). I am sure that many of the responses in support are the result of your tenacity! I put the details on two facebook groups and think that prompted a couple of responses.
The supporting comments are by far the majority and although this is a consultation and not a referendum they must carry some weight, especially as most of them point to the safety case for the development. Interestingly one of the more recent posters has raised the question as to whether the change to the taxiway should be considered as 'permitted development' and not subject to planning consent. I don't know the technicalities, but it did strike me that planning consent for simply widening and straightening an existing 'path' was a bit over the top.
With best wishes
Mike
The supporting comments are by far the majority and although this is a consultation and not a referendum they must carry some weight, especially as most of them point to the safety case for the development. Interestingly one of the more recent posters has raised the question as to whether the change to the taxiway should be considered as 'permitted development' and not subject to planning consent. I don't know the technicalities, but it did strike me that planning consent for simply widening and straightening an existing 'path' was a bit over the top.
With best wishes
Mike
Grelly liked this
Beagle Pup G-BAKW at EGKR