Wed May 13, 2020 10:25 am
#1769096
rdfb wrote:
Who can raise a (legit) MOR? Perhaps everyone should be raising one every time they witness CAT breaking the law in such a dangerous way?
If the CAA then systematically ignore every report relating to a controlled ATZ but take action for every other report when the law makes no such distinction, perhaps that would weaken their case and give them an incentive to fix it?
FISOs are supposed to MOR every pilot who lands without being given 'land at your discretion' irrespective of whether the runway is occupied or not.
I don't know how many of these MORs have been submitted nor am I aware what action the CAA would take when they get one.
When I suggested to the CAA that they allow a form of 'land after' (as used by ATC to a second landing aircraft provided certain conditions are met) thus mitigating the need to MOR, their response was 'if you're that busy maybe we should be looking at requiring you to provide ATC rather than AFIS'.
There's only one 'F' in Fulham