leemoore1966 wrote:Flyin'Dutch' wrote:In general or in relation to the UAT trial.
My questions were geared towards post trial
The implementation and roll out
Thx
Lee
I have no information that I can share* but would have thought that serious players in this market would have thought about the implementation phase and cost as part of the trial set up.
Don't you?
Few people and businesses have the time/resources to play with this sort of stuff let alone the luxury to afford the reputational damage if it all comes to nothing.
*FTAOD1 - I cannot share as I don't have info, and should I have had info, I suspect I would be bound by an NDA.
FTAOD2 - I don't know nor have had any dealings with UAT, I am an SD customer but beyond TD being a mate of a mate I have had no dealings with him.
FTAOD3 - I think PAW is a great initiative, the main drawback being that it has yet another proprietary protocol; but that is another subject discussed ad nauseam on other threads so no need to have a rehash of that on here.