Primarily for general aviation discussion, but other aviation topics are also welcome.
User avatar
By PeteSpencer
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1573214
CloudHound wrote:Sloppy reporting from local paper. The press release from the Local Authority is clearly concerned with the Airspace Change Proposal associated with notifying an RNAV(GNSS) instrument approach procedure.

It would be worth showing support for the initiative.


Can't really blame the papers, after all what is an RNAV approach if not an Instrument Approach.

It's an Instrument approach, Jim , but not as we know it ,not as we know it......
(Klingons on the starboard bow....)

Peter

Edit for strict literary accuracy :wink:
Last edited by PeteSpencer on Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
idlelayabout liked this
By matspart3
FLYER Club Member  FLYER Club Member
#1573400
Dave Phillips wrote:
chevvron wrote:Good luck to 'em.
If they have more than one inbound, how will it be decided who will commence the approach first?



One day someone will get an RA post the luddite air traffickers in the CAA.


Forecast is 220 IFR movements per year, less than one a day. Even an ex-Mil ATCO like Dave could manage that. Might need to open another console, just in case.... :D :D :D
johnm liked this