Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:26 am
#1561251
As part of some work I've been doing on the whole issue of Infringements I've made it my business to talk with some pilots on the subject, including some have recently infringed. One issue has emerged that has a cross-over with the whole Listening Squawk debate. I'd be interested in your views.
So the question is: 1) who thinks that being on a Basic Service offers any protection against you committing an airpace infringement? And for those who think that it does, 2) who thinks that it offers you more protection than wearing an appropriate Listening Squawk (FMC) and listening?
Answers on a postcard please...
So the question is: 1) who thinks that being on a Basic Service offers any protection against you committing an airpace infringement? And for those who think that it does, 2) who thinks that it offers you more protection than wearing an appropriate Listening Squawk (FMC) and listening?
Answers on a postcard please...