Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:53 am
#1560053
Paul Sengupta wrote:No, we don't know this from the thread. There was a suggestion that a "busy ATZ" may have circuit and/or instrument traffic. We don't know what the actual situation was with this ATZ other than the OP's assertion that it was minor and no disruption was caused to anyone. There was a vague suggestion that the OP was an instructor teaching a student but that wasn't confirmed.
Page 13 of the other thread from Sapper
sapperkenno wrote:If there was a "direct safety impact" or "result in significant service disruption", then that would lead to where I am. As previously stated, I wasn't aware either applied, only that the visual circuit was active, and there was instrument traffic operating at the time, but no mention of loss of separation or safety in the MOR I recived from the unit.
I'm struggling to imagine a situation where an infringer in the ATZ with the Circuit active and instrument traffic operating as anything but serious.
The views and opinions expressed by coolbeans are his own and are in no way to be taken as a reflection of the views and opinions of his unit.