Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:39 pm
#1547729
patowalker wrote:https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/InformationNotice2016093.pdf
What's a "journey log"?
G-JWTP liked this
patowalker wrote:https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/InformationNotice2016093.pdf
Russ_H wrote:I can understand the point about him being uninsured thus not able to compensate financialy to a third party if the worst happened, but to imply he became more dangerous when he became technicly uninsured?, perhaps I am missunderstanding your point, I hope so.
matthew_w100 wrote:Russ_H wrote:I can understand the point about him being uninsured thus not able to compensate financialy to a third party if the worst happened, but to imply he became more dangerous when he became technicly uninsured?, perhaps I am missunderstanding your point, I hope so.
I think it is a very long time since insurers have been able to wriggle out of a claim on that sort of grounds. In fact if they could avoid paying out because the driver had done something illegal they'd hardly ever have to pony up!
Flyin'Dutch' wrote:You, being a man working in science, no doubt have the numbers to back up that claim.....
Dave W wrote:...originals ... Cert of Registration and the Cert of Airworthiness: So 2 bits of paper. Everything else - including a big chunky AFM - can be a copy, electronic or otherwise.
GM1 NCO.GEN.135 wrote:The documents, manuals and information may be available in a form other than on printed paper. An electronic storage medium is acceptable if accessibility, usability and reliability can be assured.
gaznav wrote:patowalker wrote:It is not only the aircraft that determines what you have to carry. If you fly a Eurostar SL, or any other Annex II aircraft, on an EASA Licence in the UK, you need to carry a chart, the licence and photo id. This is why I fly my SL on an NPPL in the UK and on a LAPL abroad.
Patowalker - I believe that you are not using the EASA privileges of your EASA licence when you fly Annex II in the UK? It is the UK ANO that grants you the exemption to fly Annex II. Further, I believe that is why you can fly Annex II aircraft with an EASA PPL and CAA self declared medical in UK airspace (see CAP1441). If you were required to follow the document carriage requirements of EASA in UK airspace then you would not be able to use a CAA declaration. Anyway, that is how I interpret the ANO and the privilege that it gives me as an EASA PPL with differences training to fly.
References:
CAP1441 - CAA medical standards and licence types: https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP1441_MedicalLicenceTable_V10(08March2017).pdf
Irv Lee's excellent compendium of licences, privileges and medical types:
http://www.higherplane.co.uk/faqeasa.html
http://www.higherplane.co.uk/combos.html
I would be grateful if you could point me in the direction as to why you think that is wrong.
Best
Gaz
patowalker wrote:I fly my Annex II aircraft in the UK on an NPPL SSEA and a LAPL medical, to avoid carrying a licence on board. If I were to exercise the privileges of my LAPL in the UK, I would need to carry it, together with the medical and photo id.
Validity:
This licence shall remain in force for the holder's lifetime unless revoked, suspended or varied
The privileges of the licence shall be exercised only if the holder has a valid medical certificate for the required privilege.
Non-EASA Aircraft - In accordance with and subject to the provisions of the United Kingdom Air Navigation Order this licence is valid for aircraft registered in the United Kingdom for which the flight crew member is not required to hold a Part-FCL licence.
A document containing a photo shall be carried for the purposes of identification of the licence holder.
patowalker wrote:I fly my Annex II aircraft in the UK on an NPPL SSEA and a LAPL medical, to avoid carrying a licence on board.
GrahamB wrote:patowalker wrote:I fly my Annex II aircraft in the UK on an NPPL SSEA and a LAPL medical, to avoid carrying a licence on board.
Jeez, is your aircraft -that- tight on weight and balance?