Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:41 pm
#1495789
Is it not you who has come on to the thread with an assumption of knowing more than others?
Not me Misc, I have posted many times on many threads that I am just an ordinary private pilot flying Cessna 172s across Europe and sharing my experience and knowledge that I've learnt along the way. I certainly do not wish to be one of those 'holier than thou' people to others.
A great diagram rf3flyer, but can you explain this further:
However, since the analysis was done to support or refute the CAT safety case, excluded from consideration was any airprox wholly between military aircraft, ie. no civilian aircraft involvement, for the very simple reason that there would be nothing at all Inverness could do to influence the event unfolding.
Had it involved a military aircraft in conflict with a civilian one of any category it would have been included.
(My underline) Are you saying that:
1) No amount of controlled airspace is going to stop a mil<-->mil collision, and
2) CAT does not need to care even if the military collided between themselves above them?
Last edited by James Chan on Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If we don't take part in protecting GA access to infrastructure, the smaller aerodromes will be built over, the larger aerodromes will have exorbitant handling fees and awkward procedures, and airspace will be over-classified to Class A everywhere.