Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:09 pm
#1667770
GolfHotel wrote:To those that were interested in the original thread. I apologise for giving people who wish to nit pick rather than make a positive contribution a chance.
I thought the thread showed a couple of positive points. Unfortunately they have totally been lost following @AlanM finding it more appropriate to concentrate on a slip I made rather than the quite frankly much more important positives.
Such is life. Unfortunately.
Wow! Quite the outburst.
May I suggest a re-read from the top. I sent an answer as to which QNH was needed, an explanation of how the QNH is input into the Radar Data Processor and a link to the ENR section of the AIP.
I also praised the OP for his use of a listening squawk.
Well at least we all now know that CTRs in Italy are not to the surface (in case the OP goes there)
I am genuinely smiling at your outbursts.
Iceman liked this