Saturday 25 May 2013 17:18 UTC

Latest FLYER headlines:
Cessna's 182 JT-A makes first production flight  -  Aspen Flight Display selected for Piper aircraft  -  NATS launches infringement awareness app  
More news

Another e-petition to sign, please!

This is the place for anything not connected with aviation. Strict rules of engagement apply. The moderators' decision is final.
User avatar
Keef
Just Keef
 
Posts: 35907
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Suffolk.

Postby Keef » Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:32 pm

I just got back from an interesting meeting. I'm told (not checked yet) that Wakefield Cathedral was in the middle of some major restoration work, and has had to stop because it doesn't have the funds to pay the VAT now to be added to the repair bill. As a charity, it's not allowed to incur expense it can't pay.

Edit: seems to be true - per the BBC.
Keef
Moderatio in omnibus

Bill Haddow
Senior Forumite
 
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:14 pm

Postby Bill Haddow » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:17 pm

Keef wrote: I'm told (not checked yet) that Wakefield Cathedral was in the middle of some major restoration work, and has had to stop because it doesn't have the funds to pay the VAT now to be added to the repair bill.


Keef,
I don't understand the bit about "VAT now to be added to the repair bill". Repairs were standard rated for VAT, it was alterations which were zero rated, now to be standard rated. Even the Beeb report refers to "alterations", not repairs.

Bill H

User avatar
Carole P
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5543
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:26 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Another e-petition to sign, please!

Postby Carole P » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:37 pm

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2012/tiin-4806.pdf

This makes for interesting reading and one assumes the Wakefield Cathedral entered into a contract before March of this year
Dream as if you'll live forever, Live as if you'll die today.

JoeC
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5782
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Sheffield

Postby JoeC » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:36 pm

With £4.4 billion in assets and an investment income of £160m per year plus £750m coming from worshippers the CoE is hardly broke.

JoeC
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5782
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Sheffield

Postby JoeC » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:42 pm

PS: I like churches and have no axe to grind with the CoE. If Waky Cathedral has been caught out by new legislation then that is unfair and there should be an implementation period. I would guess not and they are being cautious until advice is given. Meanwhile those anti this legislation (ie those who fed the story to the BBC and are garnering support around it) are using the CoE and the Cathedral for PR purposes to support their side of the argument.

User avatar
rustle
Beyond Hope
 
Posts: 8506
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:22 pm
Location: Surrey.

Re: Another e-petition to sign, please!

Postby rustle » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:54 pm

The church wouldn't lie about this sort of thing. Preposterous. If they say they are "repairing" or "restoring" something that was never there it isn't their fault you didn't see it was there all along. :lol:

This tax loophole needs closing. If it is an "imposition" to have fair and equitable tax policies then I need to relearn English.
Not a lawyer, but official king to the Flyer Forum by appointment :king:
FACT

Sent from my Windows 7/IE9 HP Elitebook 8440p (or maybe my Windows 7/IE9 HP Pavilion G7 if I'm at home) but never knowingly sent from a toy.

Johnny
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 3860
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:19 pm

Postby Johnny » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:59 pm

The Church needs to upgrade its PR and get rid of the old girl singing. That has the same impact on the senses as some photos of Triumph & BMW motorcycles on another thread
Before judging others make sure you are perfect, Johnny May 2012

User avatar
Keef
Just Keef
 
Posts: 35907
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Suffolk.

Re:

Postby Keef » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:59 pm

JoeC wrote:With £4.4 billion in assets and an investment income of £160m per year plus £750m coming from worshippers the CoE is hardly broke.


Sadly, that has to pay all the staff and the pensions. It's nowhere near enough for that, which is why paid clergy are now a rare commodity and budgets are hard to balance. Round here it's typically one paid priest between six to ten churches, and when one of them retires, the usual next step is a review of options.

Here, we have three churches and no paid staff - we're an experiment in all-self-supporting ministry. There is a certain amount of New Testament precedent for that: usually referred to as tent-making. But rich we aren't, as a church. Very, very few are.

It's unfortunate that Wakefield had started work (after years of fundraising) to be caught out by the chancellor.
Keef
Moderatio in omnibus

User avatar
Carole P
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5543
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:26 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Another e-petition to sign, please!

Postby Carole P » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:12 pm

Have you read my link Keef where it shows that if the contract has been agreed prior to the March date then they are not subject to VAT up to March 2013 and that Church buildings can apply to HMRC to a fund anyway? To me Wakefield are making waves they don't need to make
Dream as if you'll live forever, Live as if you'll die today.

JoeC
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5782
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Sheffield

Postby JoeC » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:13 pm

Its not all spent on pensions/wages. Looks like about 10% of the £1000 million the church spends goes on repairs...

Around £110 million is currently spent on repairs to Church of England churches per annum, 70% of it raised by the congregations and local community.


http://www.churchofengland.org/about-us ... stats.aspx

User avatar
Keef
Just Keef
 
Posts: 35907
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Suffolk.

Postby Keef » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:22 pm

Carole P wrote:Have you read my link Keef where it shows that if the contract has been agreed prior to the March date then they are not subject to VAT up to March 2013 and that Church buildings can apply to HMRC to a fund anyway? To me Wakefield are making waves they don't need to make


I have, but I don't know the details of the Wakefield case or how long it will take to completion. Some cathedral restoration and reordering jobs take several years. The folks at Wakefield are under the impression they are subject to 20% and have therefore had to stop work. Legally, they can't commission work they can't pay for.

The Listed Places of Worship scheme is restricted in how it can be used - we've not qualified under it thus far so I don't know the details. The more usual route is restoration (more major than "repair") and that was until now VAT-free for listed properties with LBC.
Keef
Moderatio in omnibus

User avatar
Keef
Just Keef
 
Posts: 35907
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Suffolk.

Postby Keef » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:29 pm

JoeC wrote:Its not all spent on pensions/wages. Looks like about 10% of the £1000 million the church spends goes on repairs...

Around £110 million is currently spent on repairs to Church of England churches per annum...


So that goes up to £132 million as of this year. Or, more likely, stays around £110 million and more churches get more dilapidated because they can't afford the repairs.

I just (this morning) sent off an application for consent for works costing about £150k to restore parts of our Grade I church; we're lucky that we have funding for further work (which may have to be cut back) so we can cover the VAT.
Keef
Moderatio in omnibus

User avatar
Carole P
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5543
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:26 pm
Location: Cardiff

Postby Carole P » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:34 pm

Places of Worship - Listed places of worship will also be affected by the
change, although our evidence suggests that places of worship form only
a small minority of the total number of listed properties in the UK. These
will be predominantly used by Christian denominations. In order to
mitigate the impacts on these groups the DCMS is expanding the existing
Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme which refunds the VAT on repairs
and maintenance work, so that this includes approved alterations to listed
buildings.
Dream as if you'll live forever, Live as if you'll die today.

User avatar
Keef
Just Keef
 
Posts: 35907
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:25 am
Location: Somewhere in Suffolk.

Postby Keef » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:37 pm

That's the HMRC headline. The reality is that it refunds very much less than the total VAT paid. We've not used it; I'm told it's better than nothing but beset with pitfalls.
Keef
Moderatio in omnibus

User avatar
Carole P
Lost Cause
 
Posts: 5543
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:26 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Another e-petition to sign, please!

Postby Carole P » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:47 pm

So you say as a charity you have to ensure you don't spend any more money than necessary, VAT is a necessity so no charity can complain if the contract includes that and you say that you won't use a scheme which refunds VAT? I don't know how much it refunds but as a Treasurer of both public and private monies for two separate groups I accept any refund I can get and ensure I apply for any I can.
Dream as if you'll live forever, Live as if you'll die today.

PreviousNext

Return to Non aviation stuff

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: defcribed and 8 guests

click here Login / Register